So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp khám phá tuần tự× | Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp tam giác hóa đồng thời× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thiết kế nghiên cứu | Thiết kế nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2007 | 2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.) |
| Người khởi xướng | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Loại | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 |
| Tên gọi khác | exploratory sequential design, SEQEXP, qual → quan design, instrument-development mixed methods | convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The sequential exploratory mixed methods design begins with a qualitative phase to explore a poorly understood phenomenon, then builds on those findings in a second quantitative phase — most commonly to develop and test a measurement instrument, or to test whether themes identified qualitatively generalise across a broader population. The two phases are conducted in sequence, with qualitative results explicitly informing the design and content of the quantitative strand. | The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|