So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích độ nhạy dựa trên chọn mẫu có chủ đích× | Lấy mẫu Biến thiên Tối đa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Rooted in Patton's purposive sampling typology; sensitivity analysis practices formalized in research synthesis literature | Lincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton |
| Loại≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling with robustness verification | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972123 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | purposive sampling with sensitivity checks, robust purposive sampling, sensitivity-tested purposive selection | maximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling |
| Liên quan | 5 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Sensitivity analysis-based purposive sampling extends conventional purposive sampling by systematically testing whether key findings or case-selection decisions change when the inclusion criteria, selection logic, or boundary conditions are altered. It applies the logic of sensitivity analysis — standard in quantitative research and systematic reviews — to qualitative case selection, giving researchers explicit evidence of how robust their purposive choices are to plausible alternative selection rules. | Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|