ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Đánh giá Xét nghiệm Sàng lọc×Phân tích liều-đáp ứng×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcDịch tễ học
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000sConceptual roots 16th century; modern epidemiological application mid-20th century
Người khởi xướngWilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluationParacelsus (conceptual foundation); formalized by John Snow and later Bradford Hill
LoạiObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation designQuantitative analytical method
Công trình gốcWilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Tên gọi khácscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STEexposure-response analysis, concentration-response modeling, dose-response modeling, DRA
Liên quan64
Tóm tắtScreening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.Dose-response analysis quantifies the relationship between the magnitude of an exposure (the dose) and the probability or rate of an outcome (the response). It is a core analytical strategy in epidemiology and toxicology, providing evidence that increasing exposure systematically increases — or decreases — the risk of disease. A demonstrated dose-response gradient is one of Bradford Hill's classic criteria supporting causal inference.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Screening Test Evaluation · Dose-Response Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare