ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Đánh giá Xét nghiệm Sàng lọc×Thiết kế nghiên cứu độ chính xác chẩn đoán×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcNghiên cứu lâm sàng
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s2003-2015
Người khởi xướngWilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluationBossuyt, Reitsma, and STARD group (2003); clinical epidemiology pioneers
LoạiObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation designResearch Design
Công trình gốcWilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40–44. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STEdiagnostic accuracy study, test accuracy, STARD, diagnostic evaluation
Liên quan62
Tóm tắtScreening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.A diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a new diagnostic test (or biomarker, imaging modality, clinical assessment) detects the presence or absence of disease compared to a reference standard (gold standard). Standardized since 2003 by the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) initiative, diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental to clinical medicine, determining whether and how new tests can improve patient diagnosis and treatment.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Screening Test Evaluation · Diagnostic Accuracy Study Design. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare