ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích khoa học liệu×Phân tích đồng trích dẫn (Co-Citation Analysis)×
Lĩnh vựcTrắc lượng khoa họcTrắc lượng thư mục
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work)1973
Người khởi xướngV. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods)Henry Small
LoạiQuantitative literature analysisMethod
Công trình gốcNalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka. link ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácscientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysisco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Liên quan65
Tóm tắtScientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Scientometric Analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare