So sánh phương pháp

	Hệ thống Đánh giá Giải quyết Rạn nứt	Thang đo Mức độ Đồng thuận giữa Bệnh nhân và Nhà trị liệu
Lĩnh vực	Nghiên cứu liệu pháp tâm lý	Nghiên cứu liệu pháp tâm lý
Họ	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Năm ra đời	1993	1965
Người khởi xướng	Jeremy D. Safran, J. Christopher Muran	Edward H. Nash, Robert Hoehn-Saric
Loại	Observer/Clinician-rated	Client/Therapist-rated
Công trình gốc	Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Samstag, L. W. (1994). Resolving therapeutic alliance ruptures: A task analytic investigation. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–255). New York: John Wiley & Sons.	Nash, E. H., Hoehn-Saric, R., Battle, C. C., Stone, A. R., Imber, S. D., & Frank, J. D. (1965). Systemic preparation of patients for psychotherapy: Effects on therapy behavior and outcome. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2(4), 267–281.
Tên gọi khác	RRRS, Alliance Rupture Rating Scale, Rupture Resolution Scale	PTAS, Goal Agreement Scale
Liên quan	4	4
Tóm tắt	The Rupture Resolution Rating System (RRRS) is an observer-based measure designed to assess the quality of therapist response to alliance ruptures and the degree to which ruptures are resolved within psychotherapy sessions. Developed by Safran and Muran, the RRRS operationalizes the principle that ruptures—temporary breaks in empathy, collaboration, or understanding between therapist and client—are normal therapy events and that how therapists repair them predicts therapeutic benefit. The RRRS codes the presence, severity, and resolution of ruptures, revealing therapist skill in navigating relational challenges.	The Patient-Therapist Agreement Scale (PTAS) measures the degree to which client and therapist agree on therapy goals, treatment focus, and expected treatment duration—a core component of the therapeutic alliance. Developed by Nash and colleagues in their foundational study of psychotherapy preparation, the PTAS operationalizes the principle that shared understanding of 'what we're working on and how long it will take' predicts engagement and outcome. It is used primarily in research and training to assess goal alignment and identify mismatches that may undermine treatment.