So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Chỉ số Chất lượng Cuộc sống do Tổn thương Chóp Xoay× | Thang đo Chức năng Riêng biệt cho Bệnh nhân× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Y học thể thao | Y học thể thao |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1998 | 1995 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Rotator cuff outcome measurement literature consensus | Paul W. Stratford, Gill Westaway, Colin Gill, Jill M. Binkley |
| Loại | Patient self-report | Patient self-report |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Lippitt SB, Harryman DT, Matsen FA III. A practical tool for evaluating function: The Simple Shoulder Test. In: Matsen FA III, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ, eds. The Shoulder: A Balance of Mobility and Stability. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1993. link ↗ | Stratford PW, Gill C, Westaway MD, Binkley JM. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient-specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47(4):258-263. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | RC-QoL, Rotator Cuff Quality of Life | PSFS |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Index (RC-QoL) is a rotator cuff-specific outcome instrument that measures symptom impact and functional limitations in patients with rotator cuff disease. Developed within rotator cuff treatment literature, the RC-QoL captures the physical, emotional, and social burden of rotator cuff pathology—pain, functional limitations, sleep disturbance, psychological distress—providing a patient-centered perspective on disease impact beyond mechanical function alone. The RC-QoL is widely used in rotator cuff repair and conservative management outcome studies. | The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is a unique, individualized outcome instrument that captures patient-identified functional limitations and tracks change in those specific activities. Developed by Stratford and colleagues in 1995 and published in Physiotherapy Canada, the PSFS revolutionized patient-centered assessment by allowing each patient to identify and rate the three to five activities most important to them, rather than answering predetermined questions. This approach ensures relevance and maximizes the instrument's sensitivity to clinically meaningful change in patient-valued outcomes. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|