ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích sống còn hiệu chỉnh rủi ro×Ghép cặp điểm xu hướng×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcThống kê nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1972 (Cox regression); broader covariate-adjusted survival methods developed 1970s–1990s1983
Người khởi xướngD. R. Cox (regression framework); extensions via Kaplan & Meier, Breslow, and othersPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
LoạiObservational and experimental analytical methodMethod
Công trình gốcCox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34(2), 187–220. link ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Tên gọi kháccovariate-adjusted survival analysis, adjusted time-to-event analysis, risk-stratified survival analysis, adjusted Kaplan-Meier / Cox analysisPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Liên quan53
Tóm tắtRisk-adjusted survival analysis estimates the time to an event of interest — such as death, relapse, or hospital readmission — while simultaneously accounting for baseline differences in patient characteristics (covariates). By incorporating confounders such as age, comorbidities, or disease severity, it produces hazard ratios, survival curves, and median survival estimates that are attributable to the factor of interest rather than to pre-existing risk differences between groups.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Risk-adjusted survival analysis · Propensity Score Matching. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare