ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Đánh giá sai số sàng lọc điều chỉnh theo rủi ro×ROC analysis×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcThống kê
HọProcess / pipelineHypothesis test
Năm ra đờiLate 1990s–2000s (formal statistical framework ~1997–2009)1954 (signal detection); 1982 (AUC formalization)
Người khởi xướngMargaret Sullivan Pepe and colleagues (covariate-adjusted ROC methodology)Peterson, Birdsall & Fox (signal detection theory); Hanley & McNeil (medical statistics)
LoạiAnalytical study designDiagnostic accuracy evaluation
Công trình gốcPepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198565826Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácrisk-stratified screening accuracy study, covariate-adjusted diagnostic accuracy evaluation, risk-adjusted screening performance assessment, RASTEROC curve analysis, AUC analysis, sensitivity-specificity analysis, diagnostic accuracy analysis
Liên quan64
Tóm tắtRisk-adjusted screening test evaluation assesses the sensitivity, specificity, and overall discriminatory accuracy of a screening test after accounting for patient-level risk factors (covariates) that independently influence test results or disease prevalence. By conditioning performance metrics on observed covariates — age, sex, comorbidities, or prior screening history — this approach yields accuracy estimates that are not confounded by differences in population risk profiles, enabling fair comparisons across subgroups or study settings.ROC analysis evaluates how well a continuous or ordinal test variable discriminates between two binary outcome classes. By plotting the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1 − specificity) across all decision thresholds, it produces a curve whose area under the curve (AUC) quantifies overall discriminative power, ranging from 0.5 (chance) to 1.0 (perfect discrimination).
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Risk-adjusted screening test evaluation · ROC analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare