So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Các nguyên tắc về liêm chính nghiên cứu× | Xung đột lợi ích trong nghiên cứu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Đạo đức nghiên cứu | Đạo đức nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2007 | 2013 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Multiple (National Academies, NIH/ORI, ESOMAR, individual discipline standards) | Multiple (NIH, ICMJE, institutional COI policies) |
| Loại≠ | Framework | Guideline |
| Công trình gốc≠ | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. The National Academies Press. DOI ↗ | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2023). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. ICMJE Recommendations for Manuscript Authorship. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | Responsible Conduct of Research, RCR, Research Ethics Standards | COI, Conflicts of Interest |
| Liên quan≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Research integrity encompasses the ethical and professional standards that guide responsible conduct in all aspects of research—from study design and data collection through analysis, reporting, and publication. The core principles—honesty, transparency, accountability, respect, and stewardship—ensure that research is trustworthy, reproducible, and contributes legitimate knowledge. These principles are universal across disciplines and are enforced through institutional policies, professional standards, and regulatory oversight. Violations of research integrity undermine scientific credibility and can harm subjects, institutions, and public trust. | A conflict of interest (COI) in research exists when a researcher has financial, professional, or personal interests that might bias their research judgment or outcomes. Conflicts are inherent in research communities—researchers often have legitimate stakes in their research's success—but unmanaged conflicts compromise research integrity and public trust. Managing COI requires transparent disclosure, institutional oversight, and proactive mitigation strategies to minimize bias risk while allowing legitimate research to proceed. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|