So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thu thập tài liệu từ xa× | Thu thập tài liệu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2000s–present (digital shift of traditional document collection) | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Rooted in classical document analysis (Bowen 2009; Scott 1990); remote modality formalized in digital humanities and qualitative online research from the 2000s onward | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative / mixed-methods data collection technique | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique |
| Công trình gốc | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | digital document retrieval, online archival collection, virtual document gathering, remote archival research | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Remote Document Collection is a data collection technique in which researchers gather written, visual, or multimedia documents from digital sources — online archives, institutional repositories, cloud storage, email, or government databases — without requiring physical presence. It extends classical document analysis into digital environments, enabling access to geographically dispersed or restricted materials and making it especially valuable for large-scale, cross-national, or time-sensitive research projects. | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|