So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Relative Deprivation Scale× | System Justification Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Tâm lý học chính trị | Tâm lý học chính trị |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1966 | 1994 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Walter Runciman; Heather Smith & Thomas Pettigrew | John T. Jost & Mahzarin R. Banaji |
| Loại≠ | Self-report perception scale | Self-report attitude scale |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232. DOI ↗ | Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | RD Scale, Fraternal Relative Deprivation Scale, Group Relative Deprivation Measure | SJS, General System Justification Scale, Economic System Justification Scale |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Relative Deprivation Scale measures the subjective sense that one's own group (fraternal/group relative deprivation) or oneself (egoistic/individual relative deprivation) is unjustly worse off than a relevant comparison standard, accompanied by feelings of resentment. Building on Runciman (1966) and synthesized by Smith and colleagues (2012), it captures the three-component process, cognitive comparison, appraisal of injustice, and affective resentment, that links inequality to political action. | The System Justification Scale operationalizes system justification theory, introduced by Jost and Banaji (1994), which holds that people are motivated to defend, bolster, and rationalize the existing social, economic, and political status quo, even when doing so runs against their personal or group interest. The general version, refined by Kay and Jost (2003), is an 8-item self-report measure on which respondents rate agreement with statements such as 'In general, the American political system operates as it should' on a 7- or 9-point Likert scale. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|