ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Relative Deprivation Scale×Thang đo Mức độ Tham gia Chính trị×
Lĩnh vựcTâm lý học chính trịTâm lý học chính trị
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19661995
Người khởi xướngWalter Runciman; Heather Smith & Thomas PettigrewSidney Verba, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Henry Brady
LoạiSelf-report perception scaleSelf-report
Công trình gốcSmith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232. DOI ↗Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. link ↗
Tên gọi khácRD Scale, Fraternal Relative Deprivation Scale, Group Relative Deprivation MeasurePPCS, Civic Participation Measure, Political Activity Scale
Liên quan43
Tóm tắtThe Relative Deprivation Scale measures the subjective sense that one's own group (fraternal/group relative deprivation) or oneself (egoistic/individual relative deprivation) is unjustly worse off than a relevant comparison standard, accompanied by feelings of resentment. Building on Runciman (1966) and synthesized by Smith and colleagues (2012), it captures the three-component process, cognitive comparison, appraisal of injustice, and affective resentment, that links inequality to political action.The Political Participation Scale measures engagement in civic and political activities, encompassing voting, campaign involvement, contacting officials, organizational membership, community volunteering, and protest activity. Developed by Verba, Schlozman, and Brady (1995), the measure captures both conventional participation (voting, contacting representatives) and unconventional participation (protest, civil disobedience). It addresses fundamental questions in political science: Why do some citizens engage while others withdraw? How do structural resources (time, money, education) and psychological factors (efficacy, interest) drive participation?
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Relative Deprivation Scale · Political Participation Scale. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-25 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare