ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Randomized Controlled Trial in Criminology×Deterrence Analysis×
Lĩnh vựcCriminologyCriminology
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19951968
Người khởi xướngLawrence W. Sherman & David WeisburdCesare Beccaria & Jeremy Bentham (classical); Gary Becker & Daniel Nagin (modern)
LoạiExperimental impact evaluation of justice interventionsTheory and empirical analysis of how punishment deters offending
Công trình gốcSherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime hot spots: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648. DOI ↗Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century: A review of the evidence. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199–263. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácCriminological Field Experiment, Experimental Criminology Trial, Place-Based Randomized Trial, Justice RCTDeterrence Theory, Certainty-Severity-Celerity Analysis, Perceptual Deterrence Analysis, Focused Deterrence Analysis
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtA randomized controlled trial (RCT) in criminology evaluates a justice intervention — such as hot-spots policing, a deterrence message, or a reentry program — by randomly assigning units (places, people, or cases) to receive the intervention or to serve as controls. Because assignment is by chance, treatment and control groups are statistically equivalent at baseline, so any later difference in crime or reoffending can be attributed to the intervention rather than to selection. Sherman and Weisburd's 1995 Minneapolis hot-spots patrol experiment helped establish the design as the gold standard of experimental criminology.Deterrence analysis studies how the threat and imposition of legal punishment discourage crime. Rooted in classical criminology and formalized in Gary Becker's economic model, it distinguishes the certainty, severity, and celerity of punishment, separates perceived from objective sanction risk, and uses quasi-experimental and perceptual evidence — synthesized by Daniel Nagin — to test how much, and through what channels, punishment actually deters.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Randomized Controlled Trial in Criminology · Deterrence Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-25 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare