So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp ưu tiên định lượng× | Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp giải thích tuần tự× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thiết kế nghiên cứu | Thiết kế nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2003–2009 | 2007 (formalized in Creswell & Plano Clark's mixed methods typology) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Loại | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Công trình gốc | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Tên gọi khác | QUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methods | explanatory sequential design, QUAN → qual design, two-phase explanatory design, sequential explanatory design |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Quantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other. | The explanatory sequential mixed methods design is a two-phase research approach in which a quantitative study is conducted first, and qualitative data are then collected specifically to help explain or elaborate the initial quantitative results. The quantitative phase carries greater priority; the qualitative phase is purposefully built around the findings — such as surprising results, outliers, or statistically significant relationships — that need deeper interpretation. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|