ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp thực dụng định lượng chiếm ưu thế×Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp thực dụng×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế nghiên cứuThiết kế nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1998–2010Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
Người khởi xướngTashakkori & Teddlie (mixed methods paradigm discourse); pragmatic strand systematized by Morgan and CreswellJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
LoạiMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
Công trình gốcTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Tên gọi khácQUAN-dominant pragmatic MMR, pragmatic quantitative-priority mixed design, quan-priority pragmatic designpragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtA mixed methods design in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight while a smaller qualitative component provides contextual depth. Grounded in philosophical pragmatism, design decisions — including timing, sequencing, and the scope of each strand — are driven by what best answers the research question rather than by adherence to a single paradigmatic tradition.Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Quantitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods · Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare