So sánh phương pháp

	Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp đồng thời nhúng, ưu thế định tính	Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp ưu tiên định tính
Lĩnh vực	Thiết kế nghiên cứu	Thiết kế nghiên cứu
Họ	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Năm ra đời	2003–2011	1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies)
Người khởi xướng	Creswell & Plano Clark (embedded design); dominance weighting formalized in Teddlie & Tashakkori	Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Loại	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Công trình gốc	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Tên gọi khác	QUAL-dominant embedded concurrent design, qualitative-priority embedded mixed methods, concurrent nested mixed methods (QUAL dominant), QUAL+quan concurrent embedded design	QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods
Liên quan	5	6
Tóm tắt	A qualitative-dominant concurrent embedded mixed methods design collects qualitative and quantitative data simultaneously, but the qualitative strand carries the primary weight — it drives the research questions, generates the main findings, and frames interpretation. The quantitative strand is embedded within the larger qualitative study to provide supplemental support, context-setting, or triangulation, without displacing the qualitative logic at the core.	Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story.