So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Chọn mẫu có chủ đích× | Chọn mẫu trường hợp lệch chuẩn× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | Formalized ~1980–1990 | 1990 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry | Michael Quinn Patton |
| Loại≠ | Non-probability sampling strategy | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| Tên gọi khác | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling | extreme case sampling, outlier sampling, negative case sampling, deviant-case selection |
| Liên quan≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. | Deviant case sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher intentionally selects cases that are unusual, exceptional, or markedly different from the norm — outliers, extreme successes, or conspicuous failures. The goal is not statistical representation but deep learning from cases that illuminate the boundaries of a phenomenon, challenge prevailing assumptions, or reveal processes that typical cases obscure. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|