ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Đánh giá thử nghiệm sàng lọc tiềm năng×Đánh giá Xét nghiệm Sàng lọc×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcDịch tễ học
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1980s–2000s (STARD 2003, updated 2015)1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
Người khởi xướngFormalized through diagnostic accuracy methodology (Sackett, Haynes, Tugwell; STARD initiative)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
LoạiProspective observational study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
Công trình gốcBossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., et al. (2015). STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
Tên gọi khácprospective diagnostic accuracy study, prospective test performance study, forward-looking screening validation, prospective DTA studyscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtA prospective screening test evaluation enrolls participants before the outcome is known, applies the screening test and the reference standard in temporal sequence, and measures how accurately the test identifies individuals with or without the target condition. This forward-looking design minimizes workup bias and spectrum bias, producing estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values that are more generalizable to real clinical or public-health screening contexts than retrospective alternatives.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Prospective Screening Test Evaluation · Screening Test Evaluation. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare