So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Kiểm định z cho hai tỷ lệ× | Phép kiểm dấu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thống kê | Thống kê |
| Họ | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1900 | 1946 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Karl Pearson / classical large-sample z approximation | W. J. Dixon & A. M. Mood |
| Loại≠ | Parametric proportion comparison | Nonparametric median test |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (3rd ed.). Wiley. DOI ↗ | Dixon, W. J. & Mood, A. M. (1946). The statistical sign test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 41(236), 557–566. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | z-test for proportions, two-sample proportion test, one-proportion z-test, Oran Testi — z Testi (Oranlar) | İşaret Testi (Sign Test), one-sample sign test, paired sign test |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The proportion test (z-test for proportions) is a parametric hypothesis test that compares one or two sample proportions against a reference value or each other. Grounded in the large-sample normal approximation formalized by Fleiss, Levin, and Paik (2003), it is the standard tool for binary outcome comparisons when samples are large enough for the central limit theorem to apply. | The sign test is the simplest nonparametric hypothesis test for deciding whether the median of paired differences — or of a single sample — differs significantly from a hypothesised value. Formalised by W. J. Dixon and A. M. Mood in 1946, it imposes virtually no distributional assumptions and can be applied to any data where individual differences can be classified as positive or negative. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|