ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Propensity Score Matching in Education×What Works Clearinghouse Standards×
Lĩnh vựcEducationEducation
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19832022
Người khởi xướngRosenbaum & Rubin (method); educational application widespread (Stuart and others)Institute of Education Sciences (IES), U.S. Department of Education
LoạiObservational causal inference by matching treated and untreated units on treatment probabilityStandards and procedures for assessing the causal credibility of education studies
Công trình gốcRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 5.0. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. link ↗
Tên gọi khácEducational Propensity Score Matching, PSM in Education, Propensity Matching for School Effects, Observational Causal MatchingWWC Standards, WWC Evidence Standards, What Works Clearinghouse Review, WWC Study Rating
Liên quan43
Tóm tắtPropensity score matching estimates the causal effect of an educational treatment from observational data by pairing treated students, schools, or teachers with comparison units that had the same probability of receiving the treatment given their observed characteristics. Introduced by Rosenbaum and Rubin, it collapses many confounding variables into a single score and matches on it, approximating the balance a randomized experiment would create. In education — where randomizing program participation, retention, or school choice is often impossible — it is a widely used quasi-experimental tool.The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) standards are the protocol the U.S. Institute of Education Sciences uses to judge how much confidence an education study's findings deserve as causal evidence. They specify which designs can support causal claims, how to screen for threats such as attrition and confounding, and how to rate each study — Meets Standards Without Reservations, With Reservations, or Does Not Meet Standards — before synthesizing the body of evidence. The standards are a cornerstone of evidence-based education policy in the United States.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Propensity Score Matching in Education · What Works Clearinghouse Standards. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-25 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare