So sánh phương pháp

	Đánh giá Chương trình	Nghiên cứu đối chứng ngẫu nhiên (RCT)
Lĩnh vực	Phương pháp thực địa	Thiết kế thí nghiệm
Họ	Process / pipeline	Hypothesis test
Năm ra đời	1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)	1948
Người khởi xướng	Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi	James Lind (early precursor, 1747); modern formulation: Austin Bradford Hill & Medical Research Council (1948)
Loại	Applied evaluation methodology	Interventional comparative study
Công trình gốc	Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944	Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. BMJ, 340, c332.
Tên gọi khác	evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation	RCT, randomised controlled trial, clinical trial, Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma (RCT) Tasarımı
Liên quan	3	7
Tóm tắt	Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.	A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard experimental design in clinical and health research, in which participants are randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group so that the effect of an intervention can be measured with the highest possible degree of internal validity. The modern parallel-group RCT was formalized by Austin Bradford Hill and the Medical Research Council in their landmark streptomycin trial of 1948, and its reporting is governed today by the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (Schulz et al., 2010).