So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| PRISMA: Các Mục Báo Cáo Ưu Tiên cho Tổng Quan Hệ Thống và Phân Tích Tổng Hợp× | Phân tích Meta Mạng× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Phân tích tổng hợp | Tổng hợp bằng chứng |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2021 | 2002 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Matthew Page et al. (PRISMA 2020) | Lumley (2002) |
| Loại≠ | Reporting guideline and flow diagram | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ | Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, PRISMA 2020, PRISMA checklist, Sistematik Derleme Raporlama Kılavuzu | Mixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 2 | 1 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a standardized reporting guideline designed to improve the transparency and completeness of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Introduced in its current form by Page et al. in 2021 as PRISMA 2020, it provides a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram that together ensure every stage of a review — from database searching through final inclusion — is documented and reproducible. | Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|