ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích sống còn thực dụng×Thử nghiệm lâm sàng ngẫu nhiên thực dụng×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcDịch tễ học
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đờiConceptual framework: 1967; widespread application: 1990s–2000s1967
Người khởi xướngSchwartz & Lellouch (explanatory vs. pragmatic distinction, 1967); extended in survival analysis literature from the 1970s onwardDaniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch
LoạiObservational / experimental hybrid — time-to-event analysis in real-world or pragmatic-trial settingsInterventional study design
Công trình gốcFord, I., & Norrie, J. (2016). Pragmatic Trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(5), 454–463. DOI ↗Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácreal-world survival analysis, pragmatic time-to-event analysis, effectiveness survival analysis, PSApragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trial
Liên quan56
Tóm tắtPragmatic survival analysis applies time-to-event statistical methods within pragmatic or real-world settings, estimating how long patients survive, remain event-free, or retain treatment benefit under conditions of routine clinical practice. Unlike explanatory survival analyses conducted under tightly controlled trial conditions, the pragmatic variant embraces the heterogeneity, treatment switching, non-adherence, and competing events that characterise real-world patient populations, prioritising external validity over internal precision.A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Pragmatic survival analysis · Pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-20 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare