So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp thực dụng× | Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp giải thích tuần tự× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thiết kế nghiên cứu | Thiết kế nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century | 2007 (formalized in Creswell & Plano Clark's mixed methods typology) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Loại | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Tên gọi khác | pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods | explanatory sequential design, QUAN → qual design, two-phase explanatory design, sequential explanatory design |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work. | The explanatory sequential mixed methods design is a two-phase research approach in which a quantitative study is conducted first, and qualitative data are then collected specifically to help explain or elaborate the initial quantitative results. The quantitative phase carries greater priority; the qualitative phase is purposefully built around the findings — such as surprising results, outliers, or statistically significant relationships — that need deeper interpretation. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|