ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thí nghiệm thực địa mang tính thực dụng×Thí nghiệm thực địa phân cụm ngẫu nhiên×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế thí nghiệmThiết kế thí nghiệm
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1967 (pragmatic framing); 2009 (PRECIS tool)1980s–1990s (formalized methodology)
Người khởi xướngSchwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic framing); formalized for practice through PRECIS framework (Thorpe et al.)David M. Murray (group-randomized trials framework); applied broadly in public health and education research
LoạiExperimental designRandomized experimental design
Công trình gốcSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195120424
Tên gọi khácpragmatic effectiveness trial, real-world field experiment, effectiveness field trial, practical field studyCRFE, cluster-randomized trial in the field, group-randomized field experiment, community-randomized field experiment
Liên quan64
Tóm tắtA pragmatic field experiment tests whether an intervention works under real-world, routine conditions rather than under the tightly controlled settings of a laboratory or explanatory trial. It combines the pragmatic trial philosophy — prioritising external validity and decision-relevance — with field experimentation, so findings directly inform policy and practice. The design is positioned toward the pragmatic end of the PRECIS continuum and is widely used in public health, education, agriculture, and behavioral economics.A cluster randomized field experiment (CRFE) assigns intact groups — schools, villages, clinics, workplaces — rather than individuals to treatment or control conditions, and the experiment is conducted in real-world settings rather than a laboratory. Randomization at the group level controls for contamination between conditions while preserving the ecological validity of the natural environment. It is the dominant design for evaluating community-level, school-based, or workplace interventions in public health, education policy, and development economics.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Pragmatic Field Experiment · Cluster Randomized Field Experiment. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare