ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thí nghiệm thực địa mang tính thực dụng×Thí nghiệm thực địa thích ứng×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế thí nghiệmThiết kế thí nghiệm
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1967 (pragmatic framing); 2009 (PRECIS tool)1990s–2000s (formalized in field economics and development research contexts)
Người khởi xướngSchwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic framing); formalized for practice through PRECIS framework (Thorpe et al.)Developed at the intersection of adaptive trial methodology (Berry, Bauer) and field experimentation (Duflo, Kremer, List)
LoạiExperimental designAdaptive experimental design conducted in naturalistic settings
Công trình gốcSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Berry, D. A. (2004). Bayesian statistics and the efficiency and ethics of clinical trials. Statistical Science, 19(1), 175–187. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácpragmatic effectiveness trial, real-world field experiment, effectiveness field trial, practical field studyadaptive field trial, sequentially adaptive field experiment, responsive field experiment, adaptive randomized field study
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtA pragmatic field experiment tests whether an intervention works under real-world, routine conditions rather than under the tightly controlled settings of a laboratory or explanatory trial. It combines the pragmatic trial philosophy — prioritising external validity and decision-relevance — with field experimentation, so findings directly inform policy and practice. The design is positioned toward the pragmatic end of the PRECIS continuum and is widely used in public health, education, agriculture, and behavioral economics.An adaptive field experiment is a randomized study conducted in a real-world environment in which pre-specified decision rules allow the researcher to modify the trial as interim data accumulate — for example, by reallocating participants toward more effective arms, adjusting sample size, or stopping early for efficacy or futility — all while maintaining statistical integrity.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Pragmatic Field Experiment · Adaptive Field Experiment. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare