ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Đánh giá Tác động Đối chiếu (CIE) trong Đánh giá Chính sách×Phương pháp Biến Công cụ (IV) cho Suy luận Nhân quả×
Lĩnh vựcSuy luận nhân quảKinh tế học y tế
HọRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1974 (Rubin potential outcomes); 2010s (EU policy CIE formalisation)1990s (modern applications)
Người khởi xướngRubin (potential outcomes framework); European Commission DG Research formalised policy CIE guidelinesAngrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
LoạiQuasi-experimental causal evaluationMethod
Công trình gốcImbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521885881Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗
Tên gọi khácCIE, policy CIE, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluationIV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
Liên quan53
Tóm tắtCounterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE) for policy assessment estimates the causal effect of a public policy or programme by comparing observed outcomes of participants against a rigorously constructed counterfactual — what would have happened had the policy not existed. Rooted in the Rubin potential-outcomes framework, CIE is the standard methodology endorsed by the European Commission for evaluating research, innovation, and structural funding programmes.Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Policy Evaluation Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Instrumental Variables in Health Research. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare