ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Placemaking Evaluation×Visual Preference Survey×
Lĩnh vựcUrban StudiesUrban Studies
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời20001994
Người khởi xướngProject for Public Spaces (drawing on William H. Whyte and Jan Gehl)Anton C. Nelessen
LoạiStructured before/after evaluation of public-space quality and useSurvey eliciting community design preferences by rating images
Công trình gốcCarmona, M. (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. URBAN DESIGN International, 24, 47–59. DOI ↗Nelessen, A. C. (1994). Visions for a New American Dream: Process, Principles, and an Ordinance to Plan and Design Small Communities. American Planning Association. ISBN: 9780918286888
Tên gọi khácPlace Diagram Evaluation, Power of 10 Assessment, Public-Space Quality Audit, Before-and-After Placemaking StudyVPS, Visual Preference Analysis, Image Preference Survey, Nelessen Visual Preference Survey
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtPlacemaking evaluation is the structured assessment of whether a public-space intervention — a redesigned plaza, a reclaimed street, a new pocket park — actually makes the place more sociable, comfortable, and well used. Drawing on the observational tradition of William H. Whyte and Jan Gehl and codified by the Project for Public Spaces, it combines qualitative place-quality judgements with countable measures of activity, often comparing the same site before and after the change. The result is evidence that a place works for people rather than a designer's assertion that it should.A visual preference survey (VPS) elicits a community's design preferences by asking residents to rate a curated set of photographs — of streets, buildings, public spaces, and landscapes — on a simple numeric scale. Developed and popularized by planner Anton Nelessen, it turns the often vague question of what a community wants its environment to look like into comparable scores, revealing which images people reward, which they reject, and where they agree or disagree. The averaged ratings give planners a defensible visual brief grounded in resident preference rather than professional taste.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Placemaking Evaluation · Visual Preference Survey. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-24 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare