So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Lấy mẫu trường hợp lệch chuẩn thử nghiệm× | Chọn mẫu trường hợp lệch chuẩn× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2002 (Patton codification); pilot study tradition mid-20th century | 1990 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Patton (deviant case sampling); pilot study methodology attributed broadly to pre-main-study practice traditions | Michael Quinn Patton |
| Loại≠ | Purposive sampling variant applied in pilot phase | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. [Chapter 5: Sampling Strategies, pp. 230–246 on deviant/extreme case sampling] ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| Tên gọi khác | pilot extreme case sampling, pilot outlier sampling, pilot atypical case sampling, pilot deviant-case pilot sampling | extreme case sampling, outlier sampling, negative case sampling, deviant-case selection |
| Liên quan≠ | 2 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Pilot deviant case sampling is a purposive sampling strategy applied during a pilot phase in which participants are deliberately selected because they represent extreme, unusual, or atypical instances of the phenomenon under study. Rather than seeking representative participants for the pilot run, the researcher intentionally recruits outlier cases to probe the boundaries of research instruments, interview guides, or data collection protocols before the main study begins. | Deviant case sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher intentionally selects cases that are unusual, exceptional, or markedly different from the norm — outliers, extreme successes, or conspicuous failures. The goal is not statistical representation but deep learning from cases that illuminate the boundaries of a phenomenon, challenge prevailing assumptions, or reveal processes that typical cases obscure. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|