So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Tính hợp lệ pháp lý theo thứ bậc× | Tính hợp lệ theo quy luật (Nomological Validity)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1955 (concept); ordinal application 1990s–present | 1955 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); ordinal extension in modern psychometrics | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Loại≠ | Validity assessment | Validity evidence framework |
| Công trình gốc | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | nomological validity for ordinal data, ordinal nomological network, construct network validity (ordinal), ordinal criterion-related validity | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Ordinal nomological validity examines whether a construct measured with ordinal items (e.g., Likert-type scales) behaves in theoretically predicted ways within a nomological network — a web of expected relationships with other constructs and criteria — using methods suited to ordinal data rather than assuming continuous measurement. | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|