So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Tính hợp lệ theo quy luật (Nomological Validity)× | Tính hợp lệ nội dung× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1955 | 1975 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement |
| Loại≠ | Validity evidence framework | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|