So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích Khoa học Dựa trên Mạng× | Bản đồ khoa học× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Trắc lượng khoa học | Trắc lượng thư mục |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1965 (Price); computational refinement 2000s–2010s | 2000s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Derek J. de Solla Price (network citation structure); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (computational network mapping) | Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others |
| Loại≠ | Quantitative bibliometric method | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗ | Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | scientometric network analysis, bibliometric network analysis, citation network scientometrics, science network mapping | knowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Network-based scientometric analysis applies graph-theoretic methods to bibliographic data — publications, citations, authors, and keywords — to map the intellectual structure of a scientific field. By modeling documents or authors as nodes and their relationships (citations, co-authorships, co-word occurrences) as edges, it reveals clusters of knowledge, central actors, emerging topics, and the flow of ideas across disciplines. Tools such as VOSviewer, Gephi, and the R package bibliometrix are commonly used. | Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|