So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích hình ảnh dựa trên nhiều trường hợp× | Phân tích hình ảnh× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2000s–2010s (convergence of case study and visual research traditions) | Formalized in social sciences from the 1980s–2000s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Synthesised from Robert E. Stake (multiple case design) and Gillian Rose / visual methodologies scholars | Roots in art history and semiotics (Panofsky, Barthes); social science applications developed by Gillian Rose and Marcus Banks |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative research approach |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1593852481 | Rose, G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1473943056 |
| Tên gọi khác | multi-case visual analysis, comparative visual case study, cross-case image analysis, MCVA | visual research methods, image analysis, visual inquiry, visual data analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multiple case-based visual analysis is a qualitative design that systematically examines visual materials — photographs, drawings, maps, video stills, or image-rich documents — across two or more purposefully selected cases. By combining Robert Stake's multiple case study logic with visual analysis frameworks, it enables researchers to identify both case-specific visual meanings and cross-case patterns, producing richer comparative insights than either method yields alone. | Visual analysis is a qualitative research approach that systematically examines visual materials — such as photographs, films, artworks, advertisements, and diagrams — to understand how meaning is produced, communicated, and interpreted. Drawing on traditions from art history, semiotics, and social science, it treats visual objects as data that carry social, cultural, and ideological significance. Multiple frameworks exist, from formal compositional analysis to discourse-based and audience-reception approaches. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|