So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích chủ đề dựa trên nhiều trường hợp× | Lý thuyết Nền tảng× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Định tính | Nghiên cứu định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2000s–2010s (integration period) | 1967 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Synthesized from Braun & Clarke (thematic analysis) and Yin (multiple case study design) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative comparative design | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | cross-case thematic analysis, multi-case thematic analysis, comparative thematic analysis, MCBTA | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Liên quan≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multiple case-based thematic analysis (MCBTA) is a qualitative design that applies thematic analysis sequentially within each case and then comparatively across cases. It combines the bounded, contextual focus of multiple case study methodology with the systematic coding and theme-development procedures of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, enabling researchers to identify both case-specific patterns and shared themes that hold across contexts. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|