So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Cận dân tộc học thể chế dựa trên nhiều trường hợp× | Dân tộc học so sánh× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1987 (IE foundation); multi-case application developed through 1990s–2000s | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (institutional ethnography); multi-site adaptation by IE practitioners | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative multi-site research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105690 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | multi-site institutional ethnography, comparative institutional ethnography, multi-case IE, multiple-site IE | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multiple case-based institutional ethnography combines Dorothy E. Smith's institutional ethnography with a multi-site case structure, enabling researchers to trace how the same ruling relations, texts, and institutional processes operate across two or more distinct organizational or community settings. By holding the analytical framework constant while varying the site, this design reveals both the trans-local reach of ruling apparatus and the locally specific ways people navigate institutional coordination. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|