So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Multilevel Differential Item Functioning× | Phân tích nhân tố khẳng định đa cấp (MCFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2001 | 1994 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Kamata (2001) and subsequent multilevel IRT/DIF literature | Bengt O. Muthen |
| Loại≠ | Bias detection / multilevel measurement model | Latent variable model / measurement model |
| Công trình gốc≠ | French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2008). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: Locating the invariant referent sets. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 96–113. DOI ↗ | Muthen, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 376–398. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | multilevel DIF, hierarchical DIF analysis, cross-level DIF, ML-DIF | MCFA, multilevel measurement model, two-level CFA, hierarchical CFA |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multilevel DIF analysis detects whether individual test or survey items function differently across groups when respondents are clustered within higher-level units — such as students nested in schools, employees in organizations, or patients in clinics. By accounting for hierarchical data structure, it separates genuine item bias from artificial DIF signals caused by ignoring clustering. | Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis tests a pre-specified factor structure while simultaneously accounting for the non-independence of observations caused by clustered data. It decomposes item variance into within-group and between-group components, fitting a separate measurement model at each level, making it the standard tool for validating psychometric scales administered within natural groups such as classrooms, clinics, or organisations. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|