ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích Đáp ứng Liều Đa Trung tâm×Phân tích liều-đáp ứng×Nghiên cứu đoàn hệ đa trung tâm×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcDịch tễ họcDịch tễ học
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1992 (foundational trend methods); refined 2000s–2010sConceptual roots 16th century; modern epidemiological application mid-20th centuryMid-to-late 20th century (widespread adoption 1970s–1990s)
Người khởi xướngGreenland & Longnecker; extended by Orsini et al.Paracelsus (conceptual foundation); formalized by John Snow and later Bradford HillDeveloped incrementally through large collaborative epidemiological projects (e.g., Framingham Heart Study consortium expansions, 1948 onward; EPIC study, 1992)
LoạiQuantitative epidemiological analysisQuantitative analytical methodObservational longitudinal study
Công trình gốcGreenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992). Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135(11), 1301-1309. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Tên gọi khácpooled dose-response analysis, multicenter exposure-response analysis, multi-site dose-response modeling, collaborative dose-response studyexposure-response analysis, concentration-response modeling, dose-response modeling, DRAmultisite cohort study, multi-centre cohort, collaborative cohort study, pooled cohort study
Liên quan246
Tóm tắtMulticenter dose-response analysis estimates the quantitative shape of the relationship between a graded exposure and a health outcome by pooling data or effect estimates across two or more study centers. Using flexible regression tools such as restricted cubic splines or fractional polynomials within a two-stage meta-analytic framework, it characterizes whether the relationship is linear, supra-linear, threshold-based, or J-shaped — providing far greater statistical power and generalizability than any single center could achieve alone.Dose-response analysis quantifies the relationship between the magnitude of an exposure (the dose) and the probability or rate of an outcome (the response). It is a core analytical strategy in epidemiology and toxicology, providing evidence that increasing exposure systematically increases — or decreases — the risk of disease. A demonstrated dose-response gradient is one of Bradford Hill's classic criteria supporting causal inference.A multicenter cohort study follows defined groups of participants at two or more geographically or institutionally distinct sites over time to estimate incidence, identify risk factors, and quantify associations between exposures and outcomes. By pooling data from multiple centers, it achieves statistical power and population diversity that single-site designs cannot match, making it the workhorse of large-scale epidemiological and clinical research.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Multicenter Dose-Response Analysis · Dose-Response Analysis · Multicenter cohort study. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare