So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích Đáp ứng Liều Đa Trung tâm× | Phân tích liều-đáp ứng× | Nghiên cứu đoàn hệ đa trung tâm× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Dịch tễ học | Dịch tễ học | Dịch tễ học |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1992 (foundational trend methods); refined 2000s–2010s | Conceptual roots 16th century; modern epidemiological application mid-20th century | Mid-to-late 20th century (widespread adoption 1970s–1990s) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Greenland & Longnecker; extended by Orsini et al. | Paracelsus (conceptual foundation); formalized by John Snow and later Bradford Hill | Developed incrementally through large collaborative epidemiological projects (e.g., Framingham Heart Study consortium expansions, 1948 onward; EPIC study, 1992) |
| Loại≠ | Quantitative epidemiological analysis | Quantitative analytical method | Observational longitudinal study |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992). Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135(11), 1301-1309. DOI ↗ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 |
| Tên gọi khác | pooled dose-response analysis, multicenter exposure-response analysis, multi-site dose-response modeling, collaborative dose-response study | exposure-response analysis, concentration-response modeling, dose-response modeling, DRA | multisite cohort study, multi-centre cohort, collaborative cohort study, pooled cohort study |
| Liên quan≠ | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multicenter dose-response analysis estimates the quantitative shape of the relationship between a graded exposure and a health outcome by pooling data or effect estimates across two or more study centers. Using flexible regression tools such as restricted cubic splines or fractional polynomials within a two-stage meta-analytic framework, it characterizes whether the relationship is linear, supra-linear, threshold-based, or J-shaped — providing far greater statistical power and generalizability than any single center could achieve alone. | Dose-response analysis quantifies the relationship between the magnitude of an exposure (the dose) and the probability or rate of an outcome (the response). It is a core analytical strategy in epidemiology and toxicology, providing evidence that increasing exposure systematically increases — or decreases — the risk of disease. A demonstrated dose-response gradient is one of Bradford Hill's classic criteria supporting causal inference. | A multicenter cohort study follows defined groups of participants at two or more geographically or institutionally distinct sites over time to estimate incidence, identify risk factors, and quantify associations between exposures and outcomes. By pooling data from multiple centers, it achieves statistical power and population diversity that single-site designs cannot match, making it the workhorse of large-scale epidemiological and clinical research. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|
|