ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nhóm tập trung đa nguồn×Kỹ thuật Nhóm Danh nghĩa×
Lĩnh vựcPhương pháp luận khảo sátĐịnh tính
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1980s–1990s1971
Người khởi xướngDeveloped from focus group methodology; formalized in applied social research (Krueger, Morgan, and colleagues)André L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de Ven
LoạiQualitative data collection techniqueQualitative research method
Công trình gốcKrueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗
Tên gọi khácmulti-stakeholder focus group, multiple-source focus group, cross-source focus group, MSFGNGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group method
Liên quan46
Tóm tắtThe multi-source focus group method extends the standard focus group design by deliberately recruiting participants from two or more distinct stakeholder groups — for example, clinicians and patients, teachers and students, or managers and frontline staff. Separate sessions are held for each source group using a shared discussion protocol, and the resulting data are analyzed both within each group and across groups to reveal convergences, tensions, and perspectives that no single-source design could uncover.The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Multi-source Focus Group · Nominal Group Technique. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare