So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thu thập tài liệu đa nguồn× | Thu thập tài liệu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1970s–2000s (systematic articulation) | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Rooted in qualitative documentary traditions; codified in mixed-methods and triangulation literature (Denzin 1970s; Bowen 2009) | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen |
| Loại≠ | Data collection strategy | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique |
| Công trình gốc | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | multi-source documentary research, multiple-document data collection, multi-site document analysis, cross-source document gathering | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis |
| Liên quan | 3 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multi-source document collection is a data-gathering strategy in which researchers systematically locate, retrieve, and compare documents drawn from two or more independent sources — such as government archives, institutional records, media outlets, organisational reports, or digital repositories. By assembling evidence from diverse provenance, researchers can triangulate findings, detect discrepancies, and build a richer, more credible picture of the phenomenon under study than any single documentary source can provide. | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|