So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Lấy mẫu điển hình đa cấp× | Lấy mẫu Biến thiên Tối đa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Draws on Patton (typical case sampling) and multilevel research traditions (Hox, Raudenbush) | Lincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton |
| Loại≠ | Purposive sampling strategy | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | multilevel typical case selection, hierarchical typical case sampling, nested typical case sampling | maximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multi-level typical case sampling is a purposive strategy that selects representative, average-profile units at each level of a hierarchical structure — for example, typical classrooms within typical schools, or typical employees within typical departments. It is used when the research goal is to describe or illustrate the ordinary functioning of a nested phenomenon rather than to capture its extremes or full variation. | Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|