So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Lấy mẫu Biến thiên Tối đa Đa cấp× | Lấy mẫu Biến thiên Tối đa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Synthesized from Patton's maximum variation sampling (1990) and multi-level survey design traditions | Lincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton |
| Loại≠ | Purposive qualitative/mixed-methods sampling design | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. [Chapter 5: Maximum variation sampling and purposeful sampling strategies] ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| Tên gọi khác | hierarchical maximum variation sampling, nested maximum diversity sampling, multi-tier purposive variation sampling, MLMVS | maximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling |
| Liên quan | 5 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multi-level maximum variation sampling is a purposive strategy that deliberately selects cases at two or more nested organizational levels — such as schools within districts, or patients within clinics — while maximizing heterogeneity on key dimensions at each level. The aim is to capture the full range of variation within a hierarchically structured population so that patterns common across diverse contexts can be identified and context-specific differences can be documented with credibility. | Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|