So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích mục theo nhóm đa dạng× | Phân tích nhân tố xác nhận đa nhóm (MG-CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1986 | 1971 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Classical test theory tradition; systematised by Crocker & Algina (1986) | Karl Jöreskog |
| Loại≠ | Comparative item-level analysis | Measurement model / invariance test |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030616341 | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | MGIA, group-comparative item analysis, subgroup item analysis, cross-group item analysis | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multi-group item analysis computes classical item statistics — difficulty, discrimination, and corrected item-total correlations — separately for each subgroup in a sample and then compares those statistics across groups. It is a standard diagnostic step in scale development and test fairness evaluation, revealing items that behave differently for men versus women, across age cohorts, or across cultural groups before more formal DIF testing. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|