So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Độ tin cậy hội tụ đa nhóm× | Kiểm định tính bất biến của phép đo đa nhóm× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1981 / 2000 | 1971–1993 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Fornell & Larcker (convergent validity criteria); Vandenberg & Lance (multi-group extension) | Jöreskog, K. G. (1971); Meredith, W. (1993) |
| Loại≠ | Validity assessment procedure | Model comparison / hypothesis testing |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | cross-group convergent validity, multi-sample convergent validity, MGCFA convergent validity, AVE across groups | measurement invariance, factorial invariance, cross-group invariance, MI testing |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multi-group convergent validity examines whether items purported to measure the same latent construct relate strongly to that construct consistently across distinct subgroups such as demographic categories, cultures, or experimental conditions. It extends single-sample convergent validity checks into a comparative multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework. | Multi-group measurement invariance testing examines whether a latent construct is measured in the same way across two or more distinct groups — such as cultures, genders, or age cohorts. It is a prerequisite for meaningful group comparisons of latent means or relationships, ensuring that observed score differences reflect true differences rather than measurement artifacts. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|