So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Moral Foundations Questionnaire× | Thang đo Xu hướng Chính trị Cánh hữu (RWA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Tâm lý học chính trị | Tâm lý học xã hội |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2011 | 1981 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al. | Bob Altemeyer |
| Loại≠ | Self-report values inventory | Self-report Likert scale |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366-385. DOI ↗ | Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | MFQ, MFQ-30, Moral Foundations Theory Questionnaire | RWA |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) is a 30-item self-report instrument developed by Graham, Haidt and colleagues (2011) to measure the degree to which people rely on five intuitive moral foundations: Care/harm, Fairness/cheating, Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, and Sanctity/degradation. It is the standard operationalization of Moral Foundations Theory, which argues that political and cultural moral disagreements arise from differing weights placed on these foundations. | The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) is a self-report measure developed by Bob Altemeyer in 1981 to assess individual differences in authoritarian attitudes, including submission to established authorities, adherence to conventional norms, and aggression toward those perceived to violate social conventions. The scale measures three core dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. It has become a cornerstone of research on authoritarianism, political attitudes, and intergroup prejudice. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|