So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Lấy mẫu đơn vị tiền tệ× | Các thủ tục phân tích trong kiểm toán× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Kế toán | Kế toán |
| Họ | MCDM | MCDM |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1972 | 1983 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and audit theorists | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) |
| Loại≠ | Statistical sampling technique for substantive testing | Audit procedure methodology |
| Công trình gốc≠ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Sampling. AU-C Section 530. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | Dollar Unit Sampling, MUS, Cumulative Monetary Amount Sampling | Analytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend Analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Monetary Unit Sampling (MUS) is a statistical sampling method widely used in audit substantive testing that selects individual dollar amounts from an account population rather than individual transactions. This approach is particularly effective for testing the correctness of financial statement balances because large-dollar items are automatically included more frequently in the sample, making it efficient for detecting material misstatements. | Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|