ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nghiên cứu kiểm định mô hình×Nghiên cứu kiểm định giả thuyết×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế nghiên cứuThiết kế nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1970s (Joreskog 1969–1973); widely adopted in social sciences by the 1980s–1990sEarly 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933)
Người khởi xướngKarl G. Joreskog (SEM/LISREL framework); formalized through structural equation modeling traditionKarl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson
LoạiConfirmatory quantitative research designQuantitative confirmatory research design
Công trình gốcKline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603
Tên gọi khácmodel-based research, structural model testing, theory-testing research, MTRhypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST design
Liên quan54
Tóm tắtModel testing research is a confirmatory quantitative design in which the researcher specifies a theoretical model — depicting hypothesized relationships among constructs — and then tests how well that model fits empirical data. Drawing primarily on structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), it evaluates whether the data-implied covariance structure is consistent with the theoretically derived one, yielding fit indices that indicate model-data correspondence.Hypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Model Testing Research · Hypothesis Testing Research. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare