So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Nghiên cứu kiểm định mô hình× | Nghiên cứu Giải thích× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thiết kế nghiên cứu | Thiết kế nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1970s (Joreskog 1969–1973); widely adopted in social sciences by the 1980s–1990s | 1960s–1980s (codified in behavioral and social science methodology) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Karl G. Joreskog (SEM/LISREL framework); formalized through structural equation modeling tradition | Formalized by Earl Babbie and Fred Kerlinger among others |
| Loại≠ | Confirmatory quantitative research design | Non-experimental quantitative research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344 | Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417559 |
| Tên gọi khác | model-based research, structural model testing, theory-testing research, MTR | analytical research, causal research, explanatory study, explanatory quantitative research |
| Liên quan | 5 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Model testing research is a confirmatory quantitative design in which the researcher specifies a theoretical model — depicting hypothesized relationships among constructs — and then tests how well that model fits empirical data. Drawing primarily on structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), it evaluates whether the data-implied covariance structure is consistent with the theoretically derived one, yielding fit indices that indicate model-data correspondence. | Explanatory research is a non-experimental quantitative research design that goes beyond describing a phenomenon to identifying why it occurs — examining the relationships or mechanisms that account for observed patterns. Rooted in positivist social science methodology, it uses theory-driven hypotheses and statistical analysis to test whether specific variables explain variation in an outcome, without necessarily manipulating those variables. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|