So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Ghi chú Hiện trường Di động× | Nhật ký Nghiên cứu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2000s–2010s (digital turn in ethnography) | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Emergent from digital ethnography practice; theorised notably by Sarah Pink and colleagues | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-1446287972 | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | digital field notes, smartphone field notes, mobile ethnographic notes, in-situ digital notes | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Mobile Field Notes is a data collection technique in which researchers use smartphones, tablets, or wearable devices to record observations, reflections, photographs, audio, or video in real time during fieldwork. By capturing data at the moment and place of occurrence, the method reduces recall bias and enables richer, contextually anchored documentation compared with traditional pen-and-paper notes written retrospectively. | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|