ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Siêu dân tộc ký×Tổng hợp siêu cấp định tính×
Lĩnh vựcTrắc lượng khoa họcTổng hợp bằng chứng
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19882007
Người khởi xướngGeorge W. Noblit and R. Dwight HareSandelowski & Barroso (2007), Popularized by Thomas & Harden (2008)
LoạiQualitative evidence synthesis methodFramework
Công trình gốcNoblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930780Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácqualitative meta-synthesis, interpretive synthesis, ethnographic synthesis, meta-ethnographic reviewQualitative Evidence Synthesis, Thematic Synthesis, Metasynthesis, Qualitative Systematic Review
Liên quan42
Tóm tắtMeta-ethnography is a systematic method for synthesising findings across multiple qualitative studies by comparing and translating the conceptual frameworks and metaphors each study uses. Developed by Noblit and Hare in 1988, it produces a new interpretive account that goes beyond any single study, preserving the richness of qualitative data while generating broader theoretical insights. It is the most influential approach to qualitative evidence synthesis in health, social, and educational research.Qualitative meta-synthesis is a systematic method for synthesizing findings from multiple qualitative research studies (interviews, focus groups, ethnographies) to develop integrated interpretations and theoretical insights. Formalized by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) and popularized by Thomas and Harden (2008), qualitative meta-synthesis preserves the rich, contextual, interpretive nature of qualitative evidence while enabling broader conclusions across multiple studies. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numbers, qualitative meta-synthesis synthesizes themes, meanings, and conceptual insights—answering questions like 'How do cancer patients experience treatment side effects?' or 'What factors shape patient engagement with preventive health programs?' across multiple studies.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Meta-ethnography · Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare